Environmentalists’ Big Lie about Renewable Energy

Anne Applebaum writes about how environmentalists are opposing renewable energy sources just as they are becoming practical:

“The problem plaguing new energy developments is no longer NIMBYism, the “Not-In-My-Back-Yard” movement. The problem now, as one wind-power executive puts it, is BANANAism: “Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything.” ….Are we really ready, politically, to build any new energy sources at all?”

When will the public realize that environmentalism is opposed to industrial civilization itself?

Update: I’m on Slashdot again!

PBS on "The Tank Man"

On June 5, 1989, one day after the Chinese army’s deadly crushing of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests in Beijing, a single, unarmed young man stood his ground before a column of tanks on the Avenue of Eternal Peace. Captured on film and video by Western journalists, this extraordinary confrontation became an icon of the struggle for freedom around the world.

In one of the sections, four students at one of China’s most prestigious universities fail to identify where the famous Tianamen Square photo of the “Tank Man” is from.

LTE: Illegal Immigration and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850

Politicians and ideologues insist that illegal immigrants should be deported because they broke the law. But some laws ought to be broken.

In 1850, the United States Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act as part of a compromise between Southern slave-owners and Northern abolitionists. The law made it a duty for every law enforcement official to arrest runaway slaves. A suspected slave had no right to a jury trial or any kind of legal defense. In addition, the act of aiding a runaway slave became a criminal offense subject to six months imprisonment and a $1,000 fine.

I bring up this historical episode because of a similar injustice is occurring today. Escaped slaves who risk life and limb to come to the free states of America are captured and returned to face severe punishment (and sometimes immediate execution) from their masters.

I am referring primarily to the Cuban, but also the Chinese, Haitian, and many other immigrants who are denied entry or forced to return to dictatorships. Some are political activists seeking freedom of expression, but most simply do not wish to live as property of the state, and will do anything to live as free men and women.

These would-be immigrants have shown by their actions than they are far better Americans than most people born in the U.S. While most Americans don’t even bother to vote, they abandon their entire life and culture and often risk everything to embrace the American dream. Upon coming to America, they are usually far more successful than their native born-counterparts. By any rational standard of justice, these immigrants deserve to be here far more than the millions of welfare slobs, America-hating hippies and intellectuals, and all the union workers and assorted privileged moochers who believe that their livelihood comes from a divine birthright rather than the unbridled genius and hard work of self-made men.

And yet, I see news stories in the “qurkies” section of the paper about Cubans trying to float to America in a car, or squeeze in the seat cushions of a car, as if there is something humorous about people so desperate to live in freedom that they float in open ocean in a car–twice. Or people who cross a desert with barely enough food and water to escape the crushing poverty of Mexico or Guatemala. Or people who sell their life savings and suffocate in a shipping crate for months for a chance to wash dishes in California and send a few dollars back home. I would like to ask all the native-born American citizens whether they would be courageous enough to take those kinds of risks to provide for their family.

Whether they come here to escape political oppression or simply the pervasive poverty and idleness of welfare socialist states, the immigrants who come here seeking a free, productive life are Americans-in-spirit, regardless of what some bureaucrat or politician says. Any law that claims otherwise is an abomination, a gross injustice, and should be treated in the same way that moral men regarded the Fugitive Slave Act or the Nazi Nuremberg Laws.

I do not believe the facts I mention – the plight of oppressed peoples, the risks they take, and the productive lives they lead here are in dispute. I cannot understand what sort of irrationality, what bigotry, what idiocy would make Americans deny the very legacy their nation is founded on. As an immigrant, I sympathize with Frederick Douglass, who, like me, was a persecuted minority who escaped a slave state to embrace American values and pursue the American Dream. Unlike him, I came here legally – but I’ll be damned if any “law” was going to keep my out. I conclude with his words:

O! had I the ability, and could I reach the nation’s ear, I would, to-day, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake. The feeling of the nation must be quickened; the conscience of the nation must be roused; the propriety of the nation must be startled; the hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed; and its crimes against God and man must be proclaimed and denounced.

Camera + GPS + Google Maps = Very Cool

(From Digg:) Here is a guy who took exif data from a GPS enabled camera, parsed it and sent that data to Google Maps.

I expect that before long, consumer digital cameras will have integrated GPS as a standard feature. If that can be combined with facial recognition/photo archiving software and integrated with ubiqitous devices like cell phones (which already have the hardware) we’ll be able to record and review our lives visually, spacially, and socially.

Cycling tech evolves

I was driving back from a bike ride the other day, and a man came up to me at a gas station to ask me about my bike. Apparently he thought I was a pro cyclist because he had only seen such equipment on pro bikes when he was into cycling 25 years ago.

The man was wrong on two points.  First, my bike cost $500, while pro bikes are up to $10,000.  Second, the top cyclists in the world in 1980 could not get a bike like mine for any price. The world of cycling technology does not evolve as fast as say, computers, but thanks to global capitalism it does evolve, and over time, the difference is amazing.

Here is a list of equipment on my bike not available 20 years ago (I’m not an expert, there’s probably much more)

  • Aluminum alloy frame (introduced 1975, popularized 1983) (pro bikes now use carbon fiber and titanium)
  • Shimano STI derailleur (1990’s) with index shifting (1985) (allows much faster shifting than previous friction systems)
  • Shimano integrated brake/shift levers – 1990
  • Garmin cycle computer (1983), with GPS navigation tools (1990), wireless cadence sensor and heart monitor (1977)  All of that in a single tiny device that syncs with your computer and creates an online exersize program is circa 2006.
  • Pearl Izumi antimicrobial lycra/chamois shorts that are ergonomically designed to reduce friction, wick away moisture, and provide padding (1980’s?)
  • Aerodynamic helmet with a vented microshell design for maximum cooling (date unknown, but my 1997-era helmet looks very primitive now)
  • Cygolite lighting system with rechargable NiMH batteries (1983) and LED backup (1990’s)

(Some info found here.)

Regarding the pro-Immigration Protests

Finally, a public protest I can get behind.

My stance is more radical the the protesters though: as I wrote on the ObjectivismOnline forum, I am against the very idea of citizenship:

[The] question is: “is there justification for a class of privileges and protections that should be granted to a certain class of inhabitants of a country?” I don’t believe there is any such basis outside of a welfare state and anti-immigration policies.

Filtering technology vs. the DOJ

As you might be aware, the government passed a law in 1998 banning porn on the net on the theory that porn filters don’t work. Despite being overturned by the Supreme Court in 2004, the DOJ is trying to resurrect that law (see recent attempt to spy on Google searches). Of course, the state of the art in filter tech has evolved rapidly along with the rest of the computer industry since 1998.

A new filter called iShield is able to recognize porn images based on the content of the image (other filters look at URLs and text) and according to PC Magazine, is very effective at doing so. The next generation will probably be even better — which highlights the retarding effect regulation has on technological progress – if we relied solely on government to ban “inappropriate” content from the web, we’d never know what solutions the market might come up with. The same principle applies to environmental regulations, which block more efficient and less-polluting technologies by mandating a particular technology.

Update: Slashdot accepted my story!

NASA's dragging their wheel

NASA’s top story is that the Mars Rover Spirit has lost a wheel.  The Mars Rover mission has been a phenomental success –lasting 2 years beyond the original 90 day mission goal.

I’m happy for the success of the rovers, but I think it is pathetic that NASA’s resources are so badly managed that a two-year old mission is still their showcase effort. We should be hearing about many new projects, not breakdowns on old ones. If political maneuvering didn’t keep wasting billions on the space shuttle and the ISS (which were created because they were politically appealing) we might have dozens of missions going right now. Better yet, if they let entrepreneurs keep their money instead of taxing us to death, we might all be buying tickets to space.